Monday, March 19, 2012

New Bio: John Kennedy Toole

Butterfly in the Typewriter, a new biography of John Kennedy Toole by Cory MacLauchlin, is due for release later this month.

Its full title is Butterfly in the Typewriter: The Tragic Life of John Kennedy Toole and the Remarkable Story of A Confederacy of Dunces, and it's out on March 27, 2012.

John Kennedy Toole
Mark your calendars.

A Confederacy of Dunces has been one of my favorite novels for more years than I care to acknowledge. I read an earlier biography of Toole called Ignatius Rising and was underwhelmed. And according to a memoir by Toole's friend Joel Fletcher (Ken and Thelma), that biography is at best hackwork. I strongly suggest you avoid it. The less said of it, the better.

I was so intrigued by the forthcoming Butterfly that I contacted its author a year or so ago. Mr. MacLauchlin kindly wrote back and we corresponded briefly. One of the things I was keen to know was, How much of Toole's archived material survived Hurricane Katrina?

"I [spent] a week in the Toole Papers at Tulane," he wrote back, "digitizing almost everything in the collection for this project...on my first day I overheard some archivists discussing their massive loss of 19th century newspapers. I asked them the same question you asked me.  They told me that all the Toole papers were a couple inches from the flood water."

Whew!

There appears to have been some materials that would have been pertinent to this project that were in fact lost. Not surprising, but still a great pity.

For more about the book, see Cory MacLauchlin's official web site.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Amazon

The following item is by Bryce Milligan of Wings Press, who, I should note, published my book Praise from a Future Generation a few years back.


Amazon’s Assault on Intellectual Freedom
There is an undeclared war going on in the United States that threatens the lynchpins of American intellectual freedom. In a statement worthy of Cassandra, Noah Davis wrote in a Business Insider post last October,  “Amazon is coming for the book publishing industry. And not just the e-book world, either.” When titans battle, it is tempting to think that there will be no local impact. In this case, that’s dead wrong. Amazon’s recent actions have already cut the sales of the small press I run by 40 percent. Jeff Bezos could not care less.
One recent battle in Amazon’s larger war has pitted it against a diverse group of writers, small publishers, university presses, and independent distributors. It is a classic David-and-Goliath encounter. As in that story, however, this is more than just pitting the powerful against the powerless. In this case, the underdogs have the ideas, and ideas are always where the ultimate power lies.
Wings Press (San Antonio, Texas) is one of the several hundred independent publishers and university presses distributed by the Independent Publishers Group (IPG), the second largest book distributor in the country, but still only a medium-sized dolphin in a sea of killer whales. In late February, IPG’s contract with Amazon.com was due to be renegotiated. Terms that had been generally accepted across the industry were suddenly not good enough for Amazon, which demanded discounts and practices that IPG—and all of its client publishers—could only have accepted at a loss.  Yes, that does mean what it sounds like: To do business with Amazon would mean reducing the profit margin to the point of often losing money on every book or ebook sold.
IPG refused to accept the draconian terms and sought to negotiate further. In what can only be seen as a move to punish IPG for its desire to remain relevant and healthy, Amazon refused to negotiate and pulled the plug on all the Kindle ebooks distributed by IPG, marking them as “unavailable.”
Not a big deal? Imagine that Walmart controls everything you eat, and Walmart decides to stop selling fish because it thinks that fishermen are making too much profit. Amazon is the Walmart of online bookselling. The dispute between Amazon and IPG will affect every literate person in America. It is a matter that goes to the heart of what librarians have termed “intellectual freedom.” In other words, the resolution of this dispute, one way or the other, will affect every individual American’s access to certain books. It will affect your ability to choose what you read.
Restrictions on access to literature generally have more politically motivated origins. The banning of certain Native American and Mexican American authors and books in Arizona, for example, is purely political. Attempts in the past to ban literature based on its “moral content” were largely political in nature. This dispute is purely capitalistic, and is much more difficult to fight.
A single practical example. Wings Press had offered up one of its Kindle titles, Vienna Triangle by California novelist Brenda Webster, for the Amazon daily deal— a limited time offer of 99 cents per download. The book zoomed to the top ten of one of Amazon’s several bestseller lists. While it was still listed as a bestseller, Amazon suddenly marked the title as “unavailable.” The trail of loss increases in impact as it descends the food chain: Amazon doesn’t notice the loss at all. IPG sees it as one of its 5,000 Kindle titles that vanished. Wings Press sees it as one of its 100 Kindle titles that vanished. The author sees it as the loss of her book, period.
Lest one think that eliminating a single ebook novel is a loss of little consequence, Wings Press also publishes the works of John Howard Griffin, including Black Like Me, one of the most important works of the civil rights movement and widely considered an American classic. Amazon’s refusal to sell the ebook of Black Like Me  should be of serious concern to every American.
Ebook sales have been a highly addictive drug to many smaller publishers. For one thing, there are no “returns.” Traditionally, profit margins for publishers are so low because books that remain on shelves too long can be returned for credit—too often in unsalable condition. No one returns an ebook. Further, ebook sales allowed smaller presses to get a taste of the kind of money that online impulse buying can produce. Already ebook sales were underwriting the publication of paper-and-ink books at Wings Press.
It has been increasingly obvious to independent publishers for the last two years that Amazon intends to put all independents out of business—publishers, distributors, and bookstores. Under the guise of providing greater access, Amazon seemingly wants to kill off the distributors, then kill off the independent publishers and bookstores, and become the only link between the reader and the author. The attack on distributors like IPG and on some larger independent presses is only part of the plan. Amazon has also been going after the ultimate source of literature, the authors.
Having created numerous (seven or more) imprints of its own, Amazon has begun courting authors directly by offering exorbitant royalties if the authors will publish directly with Amazon. Among the financial upper echelon of authors, Amazon is paying huge advances. Among rank-and-file authors, not so. Here they are offering what amounts to glorified self-publication. The effect is to lure authors away from the editors who would have helped them perfect their work, away from the publishers and designers and publicists and booksellers who have dedicated their lives to building the careers of authors, while themselves making a living from the books they love. Even the lowly book reviewer has been replaced by semi-anonymous reader-reviewers. All these are the people who sustain literary culture.
For Amazon to rip ebook sales away from independent publishers now seems a classic bait-and-switch tactic guaranteed to kill small presses by the hundreds. Ah, but predatory business practices are so very American these days. There was a time not so long ago when "competition" was a healthy thing, not a synonym for corporate "murder." Amazon could have been a bright and shining star, lighting the way to increased literacy and improved access to alternative literatures. Alas, it looks more likely to be a large and deadly asteroid. We, the literary dinosaurs, are watching closely to see if this is a near miss or the beginning of extinction. Fortunately, this generation of dinosaurs is a little better equipped than the last one to take measures to avoid such a fate.
One can choose to buy ebooks from bn.com or from almost any independent bookstore rather than Amazon. One can buy directly from IPG. A free app will allow one to read those books on a Kindle. The resistance has already begun, and it starts with choice.

Sign the petition at Change.org

Bryce Milligan is the publisher/editor of Wings Press. He is an award-winning poet and author of books for children and young adults.

Friday, March 2, 2012

She Said No

Our daughter has always wanted a dog.

This kid has wanted a pooch for as long as anyone can remember. If it were up to me, I'd have said yes years ago.

But it isn't up to me, not entirely, because my wife is allergic to dogs.

So we've been unable to get one.

Then, in late January, Dana fell off a horse. Broke her arm in two places, an ordeal that has been described in some detail elsewhere on this blog. Just the other day, as this is written, she had a follow-up appointment with the surgeon we used to fix her shattered elbow. And he said that although it's been less than a month since the surgery, she no longer has to wear her splint 24/7. (She never did have a cast).

Needless to say, Dana is thrilled. She doesn't have to wrap her arm in a trash bag to bathe anymore!

But, about that dog...

After the accident, my wife astonished me by offering to get Dana a pup of her choosing, if only she would agree to stop riding horses. It was a bribe, pure and simple.

The things we are willing to stoop to.

But Dana said no. Even though she loves animals, especially dogs. Even though she's been volunteering at the local Humane Society for years (where all of these photos were taken) – a poor substitute for a dog of her own.

She said if it meant giving up horseback riding, her answer would have to be no.

Bully for her. Shows the strength of her convictions.

She has yet to get back in the saddle. But she has every intention of doing so, and I suppose we can't stop her. But now, with the cat out of the bag – or the puppy out of the bag, as it were – I wonder if she'll try playing both sides against the middle – see if she can both keep riding, and still get a puppy.

We'll see how that goes.

Allergies, you know?